Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improved Modelling Mechanism #347

Closed
DavePearce opened this issue Oct 22, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #362
Closed

Improved Modelling Mechanism #347

DavePearce opened this issue Oct 22, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #362

Comments

@DavePearce
Copy link
Collaborator

We want a clearer way to specify the model. This should operate in frames and provide a way of describing the computation as a function.

@DavePearce
Copy link
Collaborator Author

We could have a generic system for building such module checks. This would:

  • Separate padding from non-padding.
  • Provide a function for processing a frame (either at the end, or at the start).

@DavePearce DavePearce linked a pull request Oct 23, 2024 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant