You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Besides the boost version, can you please document which exact sub-components of the huge boost libraries are used?
Last but not least, can boost (as a whole) be potentially be avoided altogether or replaced by single, stand-alone dependencies (which can be in boost, too)? It looks like we mainly need boost/core/demangle.hpp, boost/type_index.hpp and boost/context/continuation.hpp
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
ax3l
changed the title
Boost?
Doc: Boost Subcomponents in Use
Jun 29, 2022
It looks like this section needs to be synchronized with the docs:
Yes the whole docs is outdated. I agree, this needs some work.
Last but not least, can boost (as a whole) be potentially be avoided altogether or replaced by single,
stand-alone dependencies (which can be in boost, too)?
That was the plan, we currently depend only on Boost.Context and type_index.
Type_index should be replaced with std::type_index and Boost.Context could be directly pulled into the repo.
The README does not list that RedGrapes depends on Boost.
https://github.com/ComputationalRadiationPhysics/redGrapes#dependencies
It looks like this section needs to be synchronized with the docs:
https://redgrapes.readthedocs.io/en/dev/install.html
Besides the boost version, can you please document which exact sub-components of the huge boost libraries are used?
Last but not least, can boost (as a whole) be potentially be avoided altogether or replaced by single, stand-alone dependencies (which can be in boost, too)? It looks like we mainly need
boost/core/demangle.hpp
,boost/type_index.hpp
andboost/context/continuation.hpp
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: