From a542058dfb168f80c31ba30239c715541286d78a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arturo Beccar-Varela <107512933+arturoBeccar@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 17:21:37 -0300
Subject: [PATCH] Added Update on Correcting this Issue

---
 test-cases/own-code-hash/README.md | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/test-cases/own-code-hash/README.md b/test-cases/own-code-hash/README.md
index e940c10..c5e1a67 100644
--- a/test-cases/own-code-hash/README.md
+++ b/test-cases/own-code-hash/README.md
@@ -29,3 +29,7 @@ Test 1 worked as expected in End-to-End but did not on Integration since it's [n
 ## Result
 
 See estimate for code_hash().
+
+## Update on Correcting this Issue
+
+Our implementation in [PR #1988](https://github.com/paritytech/ink/pull/1988) returns the code hash of the account of the calling contract. It simply fetches the code hash stored in the database by `instantiate_contract()` or set by `set_code_hash()`.