Gravity Wave Speed Expectation #2714
Unanswered
rbenamran
asked this question in
Computational science!
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
There's many possibilities: nonlinearity, dissipation, a bug in the script, or a bug in the source code. Can you provide code to reproduce your result? I would start by looking at an initial value problem in a one-dimensional model (eg propagate a very weak and therefore linear Gaussian disturbance) to see if the wave speed is wrong there. If is, we have our work cut out for us. If it's not, we can go to 2D. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi,
This question may be due to a misunderstanding of mine, but I have been using the same code from #2672, that is to say a shallow water model sim with a random height field initial condition, and have been seeing slower speeds than expected.
I turned off the Coriolis to test this, as I then expected to observe gravity wave speeds of sqrt(gH). But, for example with the precise parameters from #2672, the gravity waves should be around 31m/s while the max speeds I obtain throughout the iterations are only between 1 and 2 m/s.
Is there something I’m missing to justify the results? I've kept in kind geostropic balance when setting different parameters but I am still always about an order of magnitude less. I've also increased time steps so duration shouldn't be the cause. This is important as I’m hoping to do some spectral analysis on Poincare waves further on (with Coriolis turned back on of course). Thanks
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions