You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I found several TE families which were classified as TIR in early stages, but then classified as Gypsy in the final output: HiTE.out (see below). I have manually checked motifs in consensus sequences of these TE families and can confirm they are actually Gypsy. I was wondering whether I should trust the column 11 in all the cases like this?
Thank you for using HiTE. Based on your output, these sequences were identified by the TIR module but classified as Gypsy by the classifier, indicating some misclassifications. I recommend manually reviewing these sequences, as they may correspond to false positives or TE fragment sequences.
Hi,
I found several TE families which were classified as TIR in early stages, but then classified as Gypsy in the final output: HiTE.out (see below). I have manually checked motifs in consensus sequences of these TE families and can confirm they are actually Gypsy. I was wondering whether I should trust the column 11 in all the cases like this?
9983 13.6 0.7 0.0 AU3_HapA_CHR01 26053 27651 (85564100) C TIR_374 Gypsy (0) 6448 4839 22
3719 25.2 0.1 1.8 AU3_HapA_CHR01 1676868 1677864 (83913887) C TIR_224 Gypsy (1850) 984 5 1532 *
Cheers,
Yan
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: