Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TE classification issue #18

Open
ZhenyanLuo opened this issue Aug 27, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

TE classification issue #18

ZhenyanLuo opened this issue Aug 27, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@ZhenyanLuo
Copy link

Hi,

I found several TE families which were classified as TIR in early stages, but then classified as Gypsy in the final output: HiTE.out (see below). I have manually checked motifs in consensus sequences of these TE families and can confirm they are actually Gypsy. I was wondering whether I should trust the column 11 in all the cases like this?

9983 13.6 0.7 0.0 AU3_HapA_CHR01 26053 27651 (85564100) C TIR_374 Gypsy (0) 6448 4839 22
3719 25.2 0.1 1.8 AU3_HapA_CHR01 1676868 1677864 (83913887) C TIR_224 Gypsy (1850) 984 5 1532 *

Cheers,
Yan

@CSU-KangHu CSU-KangHu added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 27, 2024
@CSU-KangHu
Copy link
Owner

Hi @ZhenyanLuo,

Thank you for using HiTE. Based on your output, these sequences were identified by the TIR module but classified as Gypsy by the classifier, indicating some misclassifications. I recommend manually reviewing these sequences, as they may correspond to false positives or TE fragment sequences.

Best,
Kang

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants