diff --git a/exercises/itinerary.livemd b/exercises/itinerary.livemd
index 58678df08..1200c38e0 100644
--- a/exercises/itinerary.livemd
+++ b/exercises/itinerary.livemd
@@ -53,12 +53,71 @@ Enter your solution below.
 ```elixir
 defmodule Itinerary do
   def has_time?(start, finish, activities) do
+    available_mins = DateTime.diff(finish, start, :minute)
+
+    activities_mins =
+      Enum.reduce(activities, 0, fn {unit, amount}, acc ->
+        case unit do
+          :hours -> amount * 60 + acc
+          :minutes -> amount + acc
+        end
+      end)
+
+    available_mins >= activities_mins
   end
 end
 
+activities = [hours: 1]
+start = DateTime.new!(~D[2022-04-24], ~T[12:00:00])
+finish = DateTime.new!(~D[2022-04-24], ~T[13:00:00])
+
+Itinerary.has_time?(start, finish, activities)
+
 Utils.feedback(:itinerary, Itinerary)
 ```
 
+```elixir
+# INPUTS = Keyword list, Start Time, End Time
+# OUTPUT = True or False
+
+# Problem = Is the time between Start and End enough to fit all of the activities?
+# I need to know:
+# 1 Amount of minutes between Start and End (inclusive)
+# 2 Amount of minutes of activities
+# 3 Difference between the two
+
+# 1 INPUT: Two times
+# 1 OUTPUT: Minutes
+# Subtract the end time to the start time (diff/3?)
+
+start = DateTime.new!(~D[2022-04-24], ~T[12:00:00])
+finish = DateTime.new!(~D[2022-04-24], ~T[13:00:00])
+available_mins = DateTime.diff(finish, start, :minute)
+
+# 2 INPUT: Keyword List
+# 2 OUTPUT: Minutes
+# Problem / Solution
+# Go through the keyword list, convert all activities to minutes, add them all up.
+
+activities = [hours: 2, minutes: 30, hours: 4.5, minutes: 10]
+
+activities_mins =
+  Enum.reduce(activities, 0, fn {unit, amount}, acc ->
+    case unit do
+      :hours -> amount * 60 + acc
+      :minutes -> amount + acc
+    end
+  end)
+
+# 3 INPUT minutes available & minutes of activities
+# 3 OUTPUT true or false
+# Problem / Solution
+# If minutes available > minutes of activities, then true. Else false.
+IO.inspect(available_mins)
+IO.inspect(activities_mins)
+available_mins > activities_mins
+```
+
 ## Commit Your Progress
 
 Run the following in your command line from the beta_curriculum folder to track and save your progress in a Git commit.
diff --git a/reading/control_flow.livemd b/reading/control_flow.livemd
index 31f96b297..da7ac690c 100644
--- a/reading/control_flow.livemd
+++ b/reading/control_flow.livemd
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ We've already seen `if` statements, which are a useful when we have one or two b
 
 For example, we might build a weather app that provides recommendations of what to wear.
 
-We'll have some condition like **if it is cold** then provide a recommendation to **wear a coat**. If it is not cold, then we'll provide a recommendation to wear a coat.
+We'll have some condition like **if it is cold** then provide a recommendation to **wear a coat**. If it is not cold, then we'll provide a recommendation to wear a t-shirt.
 
 <!-- livebook:{"break_markdown":true} -->
 
@@ -147,9 +147,9 @@ We can simplify our programs by reducing the number of branching decisions and l
 
 ## Case
 
-Case is a control flow structure that allows you to define a series of cases, and handle them separately.
+`case` is a control flow structure that allows you to define a series of cases, and handle them separately.
 
-Case is best used when you have many branching conditions, that all work well with pattern matching.
+`case` is best used when you have many branching conditions, that all work well with pattern matching.
 
 We'll use this to improve our weather application that handles many different conditions.
 
@@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ end
 
 ### Case Breakdown
 
-Let's break down the case statement above. To use a case statement start with the `case` keyword.
+Let's break down the `case` statement above. To use a `case` statement, start with the `case` keyword.
 
 <!-- livebook:{"force_markdown":true} -->
 
@@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ If the values would throw a [MatchError](https://hexdocs.pm/elixir/MatchError.ht
 {:not_exactly, :equal} = {:exactly, :equal}
 ```
 
-That's why the following case statement does not trigger the `"non-matching case"`.
+That's why the following `case` statement does not trigger the `"non-matching case"`.
 
 ```elixir
 case {:exactly, :equal} do
@@ -434,7 +434,7 @@ cond do
 end
 ```
 
-Like `case` statements, conditions will raise an error if we don't trigger any condition.
+Like `case` statements, `cond` will raise an error if we don't trigger any condition.
 
 ```elixir
 cond do
@@ -547,7 +547,7 @@ end
 
 In the Elixir cell below
 
-* Create an variable named `tired` which is `true` or `false`.
+* Create a variable named `tired` which is `true` or `false`.
 * Create an `unless` statement. which returns `"awake"` unless `tired`.
 
 ```elixir
diff --git a/reading/functions.livemd b/reading/functions.livemd
index 933ad6ba1..a66f41092 100644
--- a/reading/functions.livemd
+++ b/reading/functions.livemd
@@ -485,7 +485,7 @@ Enum.map([1, 2, 3], fn element -> element * 2 end)
 
 ### Your Turn
 
-Create a `call_with_10_and_20/1` function. the `call_with_10_and_20/1` function should accept a call back function, and call the function with `10` as the first argument, and `20` as the second argument.
+Create a `call_with_10_and_20/1` function. The `call_with_10_and_20/1` function should accept a call back function, and call the function with `10` as the first argument, and `20` as the second argument.
 
 <!-- livebook:{"force_markdown":true} -->