Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[[AppsFlyerLib Shared] start] many times, the exposure data of our home page was nearly 30% less #244

Closed
MingYik opened this issue Jun 28, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@MingYik
Copy link

MingYik commented Jun 28, 2023

Compared with the server's interface call log and appsflyer's upload log, appsflyer's log has nearly 10% less data, and Android's report is very close to the server's data. The above comparison is the UV data after weight removal

During the initialization, the exposure data of our home page was nearly 30% less. I initially suspect that during the initialization, there was no cache in the log report or the cache was emptied, because there would be several callbacks of initializing Appsflyer when the App was first launched. The following are the callback records I verified

requestTrackingAuthorizationWithCompletionHandler: authorized popup window, resulting in applicationDidBecomeActive: multiple calls, and [[AppsFlyerLib Shared] start] many times

didFinishLaunchingWithOptions: -> applicationDidBecomeActive: -> [[AppsFlyerLib Shared] start]
requestTrackingAuthorizationWithCompletionHandler: -> applicationDidBecomeActive: -> [[AppsFlyerLib Shared] start]

Copy link

👋 Hi @MingYik and Thank you for reaching out to us.
In order for us to provide optimal support, please submit a ticket to our support team at [email protected].
When submitting the ticket, please provide:

  • ✅ your AppsFlyer sign-up (account) email
  • ✅ app ID
  • ✅ production steps
  • ✅ logs
  • ✅ code snippets
  • ✅ and any additional relevant information.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants