Replies: 2 comments
-
I totally agree about this. This is a feature-packed, well-functioning piece of software, ridden with bugs and codebase quality issues due to the long chain of maintainers. IMO general priorities should be, considering our limited volunteer efforts as a bottleneck:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
I would like to add my own issue to this discussion because it's quite aligned. The issue #100 I opened is to more Linux distros can use AntiMicroX. I saw a good discussion was started on #87 so antimicro becomes antimicrox on Debian and Ubuntu repositories. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
About
Issue for general discussion about AntiMicroX ant its further development.
Discussion about current state of app and its further development in general.
Current plans
This fork is a rather new, that's why we are currently focused on cleaning up the repository and preparing it for further development.
We are also working on making AntiMicroX easily available and updateable for users.
Then we are going to move on to fixing existing bugs
Later we will think about possible improvements and porting to QT6 (not released yet)
**Offtopic comments will be deleted/hidden to avoid spam.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions