We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The attached zip has two ibn waves. One with standard NaNs and one with NaNs from CurveFit.
These give different results when serialized:
•print zeromq_test_serializeWave(normalNaN) { "data": { "raw": [ "nan", "nan" ] }, ... •print zeromq_test_serializeWave(strangeNaN) { "data": { "raw": [ "-nan(ind)", "-nan(ind)" ] }, ...
The "strange" NaN can be created with
•make/D xData = {1, 1} •make/D yData = {10, 10} •CurveFit line yData/X=xData y= W_coef[0]+W_coef[1]*x W_coef={NaN,NaN} V_chisq= NaN;V_npnts= 2;V_numNaNs= 0;V_numINFs= 0;V_startRow= 0; V_endRow= 1;V_q= 1;V_Rab= NaN;V_Pr= NaN;V_r2= NaN; W_sigma={NaN,NaN} Coefficient values ± one standard deviation a = NaN ± NaN b = NaN ± NaN •print zeromq_test_serializeWave(w_coef)
I think we should always standardize the output to nan. Check also the same for inf.
nan
inf
someNaNs.zip
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
The attached zip has two ibn waves. One with standard NaNs and one with NaNs from CurveFit.
These give different results when serialized:
The "strange" NaN can be created with
I think we should always standardize the output to
nan
. Check also the same forinf
.someNaNs.zip
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: