Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adaptive enhancements #2258

Open
2 of 5 tasks
t-b opened this issue Sep 12, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #2302
Open
2 of 5 tasks

Adaptive enhancements #2258

t-b opened this issue Sep 12, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #2302
Assignees

Comments

@t-b
Copy link
Collaborator

t-b commented Sep 12, 2024

  • Don't do linear estimation for DASCale values when the slope is negative or zero, instead go in DAScaleNegativeSlopePercentage steps to larger DAScale values. If negative or zero with further increase in DAScale, this is the max DAScale that is acquired. Then fill in, as described next (setQC is passing in this case, independent of NumSweepsWithSaturation):
  • With negative slope, fill in between last DAScale with positive slope and first negative slope DAScale based on 'DAScaleFillInPercentageNegativeSlope'
  • Round to pA in SetDAScale
  • Add prefix (F or R or X) in "DAScale values left" to mark where the value came from
  • Add an analysis parameter to determine how many SCIs we look back for failing adaptive suprathreshold data. We currently only look at the very previous one.
@t-b t-b self-assigned this Sep 16, 2024
@t-b t-b linked a pull request Nov 26, 2024 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant