Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question/feature request: Can the appbuilder front end gain read&write access to a user's backend user.go model data ? #17

Open
gwhizoftv opened this issue Mar 22, 2022 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@gwhizoftv
Copy link

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
We need to have a way to create our own user info abut a user, without forcing us to have our own token server as well. This is so the appbuilder front end can use our data to provide relationships between hosts, and between hosts and audience, and between audience members.

Describe the solution you'd like
We'd like a way to create our own User data that is made available within a conference; or to get read/write access to the user.go data; or create our own UID string, without having to create our own token server. Using the Agora generated UID increases our Daily Active Users when a user attends multiple events.

Describe alternatives you've considered
We have created our own User data structure in our appbuilder, and sent it around via RTM to all the conference hosts and audience. It is costly, and creates a lot of traffic.

Additional context

@gwhizoftv gwhizoftv added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 22, 2022
@samyak-jain
Copy link
Collaborator

Hey. If I understand correctly, you want the ability to create a per-user state on the backend, is that right? If I understand correctly, you should be able to just add a state string to the UserAccount struct to solve the issue. And you would need a query and mutation to get and set this state respectively for each user.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants