Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for MultiViewEditors #27

Open
kaustubh-gajare opened this issue Aug 10, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

Add support for MultiViewEditors #27

kaustubh-gajare opened this issue Aug 10, 2018 · 2 comments
Milestone

Comments

@kaustubh-gajare
Copy link

Hi,

We are using AgileReview for reviews since last 1 year now. It is really very nice tool, but with 1 glitch for us.

While adding comments to our *.xml files using "Text Editor" marker gets added to file but if we use "XML Editor" or to "Maven POM Editor" marker is not added to file, however it add comments in Comment Summary and Comment Details.

So we have to use Text Editor to add comment and the switch to suitable editor such as XML Editor or Maven POM Editor for other work. Is there any solution to this.

Note: We did required configuration under Preferences -> AgileReview -> Language support for file ending, begin tag, end tag for xml
agilereview

@maybeec
Copy link
Member

maybeec commented Aug 10, 2018

@postmann this is related to MultiViewEditors.
I had a look at it via screen share. I thought we implemented it for MultiViewEditors at least for XML editor, but we did not. Do you remember the last state?

@postmann
Copy link
Member

Just had a look at the code and could not find anything regarding MultiViewEditors. I can recall from my master thesis that this shouldn't be that hard to implement. But it might take some time.

@postmann postmann added this to the 0.9.3 milestone Aug 11, 2018
@postmann postmann changed the title Issue adding comment for *.xml files Add support for MultiViewEditors Aug 11, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants