-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Additional symmetries for matrix-valued ACE bases #136
Comments
I think, one way to approach this issue would be to
However, I am not sure where exactly (and if at all?) in the ACE.jl code base we should include this. |
If I understand correctly we encountered a similar (or same?) issue in This was currently fixed in the This introduces potentially new linear dependence which can be removed by adopting another SVD. |
I would like to extend ACE to allow for representation of$\mathbb{R}^{3\times 3}$ matrix-valued functions, that, besides the standard equivariant symmetry properties, also satisfy symmetries of the form
$$G(\{r_i\}, \{r_j\}) = S \circ G(\{-r_i\}, \{r_j\}),$$ where $S$ is some prescribed involution $S : \mathbb{R}^{3 \times 3} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^{3 \times 3}$ , and $\{r_i\}$ and $\{r_j\}$ are the displacements of two groups/species of atoms.
For example, for a bond environment with bond displacement$r_0\in \mathbb{R}^3$ and discplacements $\{r_i\}$ of the atoms within the bond environment, I would like to represent $\mathbb{R}^{3\times 3}$ valued functions of the form
$$G(r_{0}, \{r_i\}) = [G(-r_{0}, \{r_i \})]^T.$$
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: