You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 25, 2021. It is now read-only.
Remove artificial distinctions between BinderHub/JupyterHub. Currently BinderHub and JupyterHub have strong distinctions between them, but this is not strictly necessary. Binder-like functionality should be a feature flag on any JupyterHub, and thus BinderHub could cease to be a standalone tool, and instead be a “particular configuration of a JupyterHub”.
We want to make sure that others in the community have buy-in for this idea, but it's hard to know exactly what steps would be needed for feedback.
Here is roughly what we want to try:
Build a prototype that others can comment on
Make a proposal that lays out the idea, benefit, and implementation (maybe just pointing to the prototype for what implementation would look like)
Discuss w/ the team and get a decision how to move forward
Updates
2021-09-21@yuvipanda is going to try and get together a prototype that shows off image building from within a JupyterHub. It's not clear how long this will take, but our goal for this sprint is to explore what this would look like. We'll re-assess next week when we understand more.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In a sprint meeting we discussed that this effort is challenging because there are several moving parts, and it's unclear what is the best path to get buy-in from the broader JupyterHub team. We decided that a good next step would be to build a working prototype that shows off image building in JupyterHub deployed as a service via a combined helm chart, to have something specific that we can point to as a benefit, and to help shape discussion with the team. So the order of operations is roughly:
Build a prototype that others can comment on
Make a proposal that lays out the idea, benefit, and implementation (maybe just pointing to the prototype for what implementation would look like)
Discuss w/ the team and get a decision how to move forward
@yuvipanda let me know if any of that looks incorrect
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Part of
From https://discourse.pangeo.io/t/notes-from-the-pangeo-2i2c-kick-off-meeting/1587
Implementation details
We want to make sure that others in the community have buy-in for this idea, but it's hard to know exactly what steps would be needed for feedback.
Here is roughly what we want to try:
Updates
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: