You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The script developed in #3030 provides resource allocation choices, but the choices are opinionated to reduce cloud costs rather than startup speeds etc.
For example, if the user can choose from ~1GB to ~128GB resource allocation, the user will for requests up to ~32 GB be scheduled on 32 GB node and for requests above that be put on a 128 GB node. A community hosting an event that will have users start with ~16GB resource allocation requests should probably instead be scheduled on 128GB nodes (or even 512GB nodes), as then at least 8 (32) users can fit on the node, instead of just 2 on the smaller 32 GB node.
I'd like this issue to represent the development of a functionality allowing us to specify something when using the script in #3030, so that we can make it generate choices suitable for an event. A preliminary idea on how to specify this could be by specifying the minimum amount of users per node to fit before opting to use a larger node. For events, we could then specify we want at least 8 users per node, and have the ~16GB requests fit be made to schedule on the ~128 node instead of the ~32GB node given ~32 / ~128 / ~512 GB nodes are the available node types.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
consideRatio
changed the title
Let node sharing script handle optimizations for events
Let node resource-allocation script handle optimizations for events
Oct 28, 2023
The script developed in #3030 provides resource allocation choices, but the choices are opinionated to reduce cloud costs rather than startup speeds etc.
For example, if the user can choose from ~1GB to ~128GB resource allocation, the user will for requests up to ~32 GB be scheduled on 32 GB node and for requests above that be put on a 128 GB node. A community hosting an event that will have users start with ~16GB resource allocation requests should probably instead be scheduled on 128GB nodes (or even 512GB nodes), as then at least 8 (32) users can fit on the node, instead of just 2 on the smaller 32 GB node.
I'd like this issue to represent the development of a functionality allowing us to specify something when using the script in #3030, so that we can make it generate choices suitable for an event. A preliminary idea on how to specify this could be by specifying the minimum amount of users per node to fit before opting to use a larger node. For events, we could then specify we want at least 8 users per node, and have the ~16GB requests fit be made to schedule on the ~128 node instead of the ~32GB node given ~32 / ~128 / ~512 GB nodes are the available node types.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: